Bristol Myers Squibb Delays Key Alzheimer's Psychosis Trial for Cobenfy Amid Site Irregularities

Bristol Myers Squibb (BMS) has announced a significant delay in the readout of its closely watched ADEPT-2 trial, evaluating the drug Cobenfy for Alzheimer's disease psychosis. The pharmaceutical giant cited "irregularities" in trial execution at some study sites, pushing the expected results to 2026.
Trial Setback and Regulatory Response
BMS revealed that it had identified irregularities in the conduct of the ADEPT-2 study at a small number of sites. In response, the company has taken several steps:
- Patient data from the affected sites will be excluded from the primary analysis.
- After consulting with the FDA, an independent party was brought in to assess the collected data.
- A data monitoring committee recommended continuing the trial and enrolling additional participants to meet the original target.
Laura Gault, head of neuroscience drug development at BMS, emphasized the company's commitment to maintaining study integrity, stating, "Our decision to exclude patient data from sites where irregularities were observed reflects our unwavering commitment to safeguarding the integrity of our studies."
Impact on Cobenfy's Development Timeline
The ADEPT-2 trial delay has significant implications for Cobenfy's development in Alzheimer's psychosis:
- Results are now expected by the end of 2026, a year later than previously anticipated.
- Two other phase III trials, ADEPT-1 and ADEPT-4, are still on track to deliver data by the end of 2026.
- BMS maintains that at least two positive trials are required for regulatory filing, suggesting the overall approval timeline may not be affected.
This setback follows an earlier disappointment for Cobenfy in April 2025, when it failed to show significant benefits as an adjunctive treatment for schizophrenia in the ARISE study.
Market Reaction and Analyst Perspectives
Despite the delay, BMS shares saw an unexpected rise, trading up almost 5% following the announcement. Analysts offered mixed interpretations of this market response:
William Blair analyst Matt Phipps suggested that investors might view the trial continuation as a positive sign, noting, "If there was no signal, why bother increasing enrollment?"
Conversely, Carter Gould of Cantor Fitzgerald cautioned that while a delay might be preferable to negative results in the short term, it "stops far short of de-risking Cobenfy" in Alzheimer's psychosis or bolstering BMS's broader growth profile.
The ADEPT-2 trial's outcome remains crucial for BMS, as the company faces patent expirations on its top-selling drugs Eliquis and Opdivo in the coming years. With Alzheimer's psychosis affecting an estimated 3-3.5 million patients in the U.S., Cobenfy represents a significant market opportunity for BMS in its efforts to offset looming revenue losses.
References
- BMS Delays Cobenfy Alzheimer's Psychosis Data After ‘Irregularities’ in Phase III Study
Analysts had noted "unease" from investors regarding the state of the Phase III ADEPT-2 trial, with BMS at one point telling Leerink Partners that the reopening of enrollment would be a "significant development."
- After finding ‘irregularities,’ Bristol Myers to extend key trial of Cobenfy in Alzheimer’s psychosis
Data from the "ADEPT-2" study, which analysts had hoped would arrive before year's end, are now expected sometime in 2026.
- With site 'irregularities,' Bristol Myers delays key Cobenfy readout in Alzheimer's psychosis
The highly anticipated Adept-2 study data will not read out by year-end as previously planned after BMS identified “irregularities due to clinical trial execution at a small number of study sites,” the company said Wednesday.
- With site 'irregularities,' Bristol Myers delays key Cobenfy readout in Alzheimer's psychosis
The highly anticipated Adept-2 study data will not read out by year-end as previously planned after BMS identified “irregularities due to clinical trial execution at a small number of study sites,” the company said Wednesday.
Explore Further
What are the specific types of site irregularities identified in the ADEPT-2 trial and how might they influence clinical outcomes?
What measures is BMS implementing to ensure data integrity across all ADEPT trials in the future?
What are the key differences and similarities in the design of ADEPT-1, ADEPT-2, and ADEPT-4 trials for Cobenfy?
How does Cobenfy’s efficacy in preliminary trials compare to existing treatments for Alzheimer's psychosis in terms of clinical data?
What are the projected revenue opportunities for Cobenfy in the Alzheimer's psychosis market given the estimated patient population in the U.S.?