Pfizer's Pipeline Shake-Up: Major Cuts and Strategic Shifts in Pharmaceutical Landscape

Pharmaceutical giant Pfizer has announced a significant restructuring of its drug pipeline, axing 11 programs and repositioning its resources amid a broader cost-realignment initiative. The move, which impacts products from recent acquisitions and high-profile partnerships, signals a strategic shift in the company's research and development priorities.
Seagen and BioNTech Programs Among Notable Cuts
Pfizer's latest pipeline update reveals the discontinuation of two assets acquired through its $43 billion Seagen buyout. The phase 1 bispecific molecule PF-08046049 (formerly SGN-BB228), targeting melanoma and other solid tumors, has been terminated despite an ongoing trial with results expected next month. Additionally, PF-08046045, a CD30-directed antibody-drug conjugate for advanced lymphoma, has also been axed.
In a surprising move, Pfizer has halted development of a mRNA vaccine (PF-07911145) for varicella, which was being advanced in partnership with BioNTech. This decision comes as a notable shift in the collaboration landscape between the two companies, best known for their successful COVID-19 vaccine, Comirnaty.
Metabolic and Rare Disease Programs Face Setbacks
The company's metabolic disease portfolio has also been impacted, with the discontinuation of a midstage metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH) combination therapy. The investigational treatment, comprising DGAT2i inhibitor ervogastat and acetyl-CoA carboxylase inhibitor clesacostat, had previously received FDA fast track status in 2022.
In the rare disease space, Pfizer has dropped a phase 3 asset for sickle cell disease (SCD) acquired through its $5.4 billion purchase of Global Blood Therapeutics in 2022. The P-selectin inhibitor inclacumab failed to reduce a painful complication of sickle cell compared to placebo in a recent trial.
Strategic Realignment and Future Focus
These pipeline cuts are part of Pfizer's broader cost-realignment initiative, aimed at saving $7.7 billion through 2027. The company plans to reallocate $500 million in savings toward pipeline development by the end of next year, indicating a strategic shift in resource allocation.
Despite these cuts, Pfizer remains committed to key growth areas. CEO Albert Bourla reaffirmed the company's intention to acquire Metsera, a next-gen obesity biotech, despite a competing offer from Novo Nordisk. This acquisition would bolster Pfizer's pipeline with promising assets, including MET-097i, an injectable GLP-1 receptor agonist supporting monthly dosing.
The company also highlighted its recent $1.25 billion deal with 3SBio for ex-China rights to a clinical PD-1xVEGF bispecific, positioning Pfizer in a competitive immuno-oncology field alongside BioNTech, Merck & Co., and Summit Therapeutics.
As Pfizer navigates these significant pipeline changes, the pharmaceutical industry watches closely to see how these strategic decisions will shape the company's future and impact the broader landscape of drug development and patient care.
References
- Pfizer's parade of pipeline cuts: Seagen, BioNTech and MASH programs among 11 axed
Pfizer has axed 11 programs including two pipeline assets from its $43 billion Seagen acquisition, work on a BioNTech-partnered mRNA vaccine and a midstage MASH combo.
Explore Further
What are the specific reasons behind Pfizer's decision to discontinue programs acquired through the Seagen buyout, such as SGN-BB228 and PF-08046045?
What is the competitive landscape for Pfizer's mRNA vaccine development, particularly in light of its halted partnership with BioNTech for the varicella vaccine?
What clinical trial data or market dynamics led to the discontinuation of the metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH) combination therapy?
How does Pfizer plan to position its next-gen obesity biotech asset MET-097i against competitors like Novo Nordisk in the obesity treatment market?
What are the potential market implications of Pfizer's $1.25 billion deal with 3SBio for ex-China rights to the PD-1xVEGF bispecific molecule in immuno-oncology?