FDA's Tidmarsh Resigns Amid Personal Conduct Investigation and Industry Fallout

George Tidmarsh, director of the FDA's Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), has resigned following an investigation into his personal conduct. The sudden departure marks another high-profile exit from the Department of Health and Human Services and adds to the ongoing turmoil within key regulatory bodies.
Investigation and Resignation
Tidmarsh, who was appointed to his position in July, tendered his resignation on Sunday morning after being placed on administrative leave just two days prior. The Health Department spokesperson revealed that "serious concerns" about Tidmarsh's personal conduct prompted the agency to initiate an investigation.
The probe appears to be linked to a complaint filed by Kevin Tang, a prominent biopharma investor known for acquiring struggling biotech companies through his shell company, Concentra Biosciences. Tang's affiliated company, Aurinia Pharmaceuticals, filed a lawsuit against Tidmarsh on the same day as his resignation, accusing the former regulator of harboring a "longstanding personal vendetta" against Tang.
Controversy Surrounding Lupkynis
The conflict between Tidmarsh and Tang stems from a now-deleted LinkedIn post in which Tidmarsh criticized Aurinia's lupus nephritis drug, Lupkynis. The former CDER director claimed that the drug, which received FDA approval in 2021 based on surrogate endpoints, had "significant toxicity" and lacked demonstrated direct clinical benefit for patients.
Tidmarsh's comments reignited debates surrounding the use of surrogate endpoints in drug approvals, particularly for complex diseases like lupus nephritis. Aurinia had previously submitted data from an extension study, leading to a label update for Lupkynis that reflected improved long-term efficacy.
Broader Implications for the FDA
Tidmarsh's resignation is the latest in a series of high-profile departures from key health agencies. Earlier this year, CDC Director Susan Monarez was dismissed after just 28 days in office, allegedly due to her refusal to pre-approve vaccine recommendations. The FDA has also seen the exits of Peter Marks and Nicole Verdun, former director of the Office of Therapeutic Products.
These departures, coupled with the recent controversy surrounding Vinay Prasad at the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, have raised questions about the stability and working environment within crucial regulatory bodies. Tidmarsh himself reportedly described the FDA as a "toxic work environment" during his brief tenure.
As the pharmaceutical industry grapples with these leadership changes, stakeholders are closely watching for potential impacts on drug evaluation processes, approval timelines, and overall regulatory strategy. The Department of Health and Human Services has emphasized its commitment to maintaining high ethical standards and transparency in the wake of these events.
References
- FDA’s Tidmarsh Exits Amid ‘Personal Conduct’ Probe
George Tidmarsh, who helmed the FDA’s Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, resigned Sunday following a complaint by biopharma investor Kevin Tang, whose affiliated company, Aurinia Pharmaceuticals, filed a lawsuit against the former regulator on Sunday.
Explore Further
What is the professional background and previous industry experience of George Tidmarsh prior to his role at the FDA's CDER?
What were the specific concerns raised about Tidmarsh's personal conduct that led to the investigation and subsequent resignation?
Have similar controversies involving personnel at regulatory agencies impacted the drug approval processes or timelines in the past?
What are the implications of repeated high-profile departures for the stability and effectiveness of FDA leadership as perceived by the pharmaceutical industry?
How has Aurinia Pharmaceuticals responded to Tidmarsh's criticism of Lupkynis beyond pursuing legal action, and what steps are they taking to address the concerns raised during the controversy?